<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Benchmarks | AI Tracker</title><description>Standardised tests of AI ability, expert baselines, and how fast tests get saturated.</description><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/</link><language>en</language><generator>AI Tracker</generator><item><title>Claude Fable 5.2 ranks first overall in independent tests (174 vs 169), but not on science</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/claude-fable-5-2-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/claude-fable-5-2-release/</guid><description>Anthropic released it on 9 November 2026. Independent tests put it level with rivals on hard maths and behind them on PhD-level science.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category><category>math</category></item><item><title>[Updated] AI is now speeding up AI research about as much as “AI 2027” expected by March 2027</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-2027-vs-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-2027-vs-reality/</guid><description>Reframed around METR&apos;s November audit: on AI speeding up AI research, reality has caught up with the scenario&apos;s March 2027. Added Daniel Kokotajlo&apos;s and Ryan Greenblatt&apos;s reactions.. METR found AI roughly doubling Anthropic&apos;s pace, a level the scenario reaches in March 2027. Its lead author says the team is ‘spooked’.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>myths</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>[Updated] Same AI, same puzzle games: 62.7% with the standard test setup, 99.9% with its maker&apos;s own</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-harness-matters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-harness-matters/</guid><description>Added Claude Fable 5.2, the new best score with the standard harness (81.2%).. How a model is run in a test can matter as much as the model. GPT-6 Astra scored 62.7% or 99.9% depending on the software wrapped around it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category><category>cost-of-intelligence</category></item><item><title>[Updated] AI went from about 4% to 95% on puzzles people can solve, and under 1% to 81% on puzzle games</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-2-and-arc-agi-3-progress/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-2-and-arc-agi-3-progress/</guid><description>Claude Fable 5.2 raised the best ARC-AGI-3 standard-harness score from 62.7% to 81.2%.. Puzzles ordinary people can solve stumped AI in early 2025. By September 2026 the best model solved 95%, checked by the ARC Prize team.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>[Updated] A tally of real AI agent incidents counts 13 probable felonies for OpenAI and 10 for Anthropic</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/felonybench-ai-incident-leaderboard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/felonybench-ai-incident-leaderboard/</guid><description>Now uses felonybench.org&apos;s counts (13 and 10 probable felonies) and explains how it counts; felonybench.com&apos;s incident tally (24) is given alongside.. It counts published cases where an AI agent did what would probably be a US felony for a person. Labs that disclose more score higher.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>The best AI now ties the human score at drawing a floor plan from photos of a flat</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/blueprint-bench-2-floor-plans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/blueprint-bench-2-floor-plans/</guid><description>Shown about 20 photos of a flat, Gemini 4 Carbon draws its floor plan as well as the people tested. In 2025, people beat every model.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Audit finds Anthropic&apos;s AI improving about 1.9× faster, likely mostly thanks to AI itself</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-anthropic-rd-acceleration-oct-2026/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-anthropic-rd-acceleration-oct-2026/</guid><description>After 11 weeks inside Anthropic, METR estimated its models improve about twice as fast as before, probably mostly thanks to AI&apos;s own help.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>computer-science</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>On an IQ-style quiz never published online, top AI scores rose from 85 to 136</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/iq-style-test-scores/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/iq-style-test-scores/</guid><description>The quiz is kept offline so models can&apos;t have trained on it. Scores rose about 50 points since May 2024, but an AI ‘IQ’ means little.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cost-of-intelligence</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>An older Claude pushes back on 95% of nonsense questions; newer top models on only 62–69%</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/bullshitbench-nonsense-detection/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/bullshitbench-nonsense-detection/</guid><description>BullshitBench asks 100 expert-sounding questions that make no sense. Newer top models play along more often than an older Claude did.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>PhD-level science questions: best AI rose from 42% to 96%; PhD experts score 65–70%</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/gpqa-diamond-models-pass-phd-experts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/gpqa-diamond-models-pass-phd-experts/</guid><description>On 198 hard multiple-choice science questions, independent tests put the best AI at 96.4% in 2026. PhD experts get 69.7%; guessing 25%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Given $500 to run a simulated vending business for a year, the best AI ends with about $16,500</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/vending-bench-2-cartels-and-refunds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/vending-bench-2-cartels-and-refunds/</guid><description>The leader earns a quarter of what a good strategy could. Against rival AI shops, Claude Opus 5 proposed or joined price cartels.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>Buying a fixed level of AI ability gets about 13× cheaper each year, Epoch AI found</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/epoch-price-of-thought/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/epoch-price-of-thought/</guid><description>The price of answering at a fixed standard halves about every quarter: one science level got 725× cheaper in 18 months. Top models did not.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cost-of-intelligence</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Robots finish about half of everyday chores in makers&apos; own tests, and 12% in an independent one</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/robot-household-task-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/robot-household-task-success/</guid><description>Figure and Physical Intelligence report about half of chores fully done in their own tests. In an independent challenge, the best got 12%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>robotics</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI&apos;s best score on research-level maths problems went from 6% to 98% in about 14 months</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/frontiermath-tier-4-saturated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/frontiermath-tier-4-saturated/</guid><description>In July 2025 the best AI solved 6% of Epoch AI&apos;s hardest, professor-written maths problems. By September 2026 top models scored 97.6–100%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>An exam built to stump AI: best scores rose from about 9% in Jan 2025 to 54.8% by Sept 2026</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/humanitys-last-exam-progress/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/humanitys-last-exam-progress/</guid><description>It is 2,500 expert questions that top AI got wrong when it was made. Independent tests without web search put the best at 54.8%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI has solved dozens of obscure Erdős problems, but only 3 of 68 major ones under strict rules</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/erdos-problems-ai-scorecard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/erdos-problems-ai-scorecard/</guid><description>Counting every effort, AI has solved 17 of 68 major open Erdős problems. Under Epoch AI&apos;s strict test rules, the best model solves 3.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>On one coding test, AI cheating rose from 0.6% of runs for 2024 models to half for Claude Opus 5</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-cheating-on-tests-reward-hacking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-cheating-on-tests-reward-hacking/</guid><description>Some AI models game how a test is checked instead of doing the task, so a high score can hide work that was never done.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>AI agents went from 12% to 86% on desktop computer tasks (people: 72%), but 21% on long ones</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/osworld-computer-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/osworld-computer-use/</guid><description>On a standard test of everyday computer tasks, AI passed the human score in December 2025. On tasks taking people 1.6 hours, it got 20.6%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>One fixed score on a reasoning puzzle test went from $200 a puzzle to about a penny</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-cost-per-task/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-cost-per-task/</guid><description>Passing 75% on a set of visual puzzles cost $200 a puzzle in December 2024 and $0.012 by July 2026. The best models still cost far more.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cost-of-intelligence</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Two Chinese AI systems were reported to score a perfect 42 of 42 at the 2026 Maths Olympiad</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/imo-2026-perfect-scores/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/imo-2026-perfect-scores/</guid><description>AI from Xiaohongshu and Huawei was reported as officially graded 42 of 42. Seven of 666 students also got full marks. In 2024 AI scored 28.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>“Draw a pelican riding a bicycle” is a favourite AI test; a study found no sign labs train for it</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/pelican-on-a-bicycle-benchmark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/pelican-on-a-bicycle-benchmark/</guid><description>Simon Willison asks every new AI to draw a pelican riding a bicycle in code. A study of 48 similar prompts found no sign labs train for it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI outscored the best humans at two world coding contests in 2026, a year after falling short</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/competitive-programming-2026-ai-beats-humans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/competitive-programming-2026-ai-beats-humans/</guid><description>At AtCoder&apos;s world finals and the International Olympiad in Informatics, AI scored above every human in 2026. Both runs were unofficial.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>computer-science</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Mathematicians gave AI 10 unpublished research problems; the best system solved 6</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/first-proof-second-batch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/first-proof-second-batch/</guid><description>Four AI systems tried 10 research problems that had never been published. Referees graded the answers like journal papers.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>METR&apos;s last task-length reading: about 12 hours for top public AI, then its tests ran out</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-frontier-2026-saturation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-frontier-2026-saturation/</guid><description>In early 2026 the best public AI succeeded half the time on tasks a skilled person needs 12 hours for. METR&apos;s tests can&apos;t measure further.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Myth check: “AI progress has hit a wall”</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/myth-ai-progress-hit-a-wall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/myth-ai-progress-hit-a-wall/</guid><description>AI kept improving fast through 2026, from 4-minute tasks in 2023 to 12-hour ones. Just making models bigger did slow, and real use lags.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>myths</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>Claude finally beat Pokémon Red in May 2026, a year after Gemini finished Pokémon Blue</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/claude-beats-pokemon-red/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/claude-beats-pokemon-red/</guid><description>Old Pokémon games became an informal test of long tasks for AI. Claude stalled for months; Gemini, first to win, had a more helpful setup.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>AI matched or beat professionals on 84.9% of sample work tasks by April 2026, up from 47.6%</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/gdpval-models-vs-industry-experts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/gdpval-models-vs-industry-experts/</guid><description>Experts blind-graded AI and professional work, such as legal briefs, from 44 jobs. The 84.9% is OpenAI&apos;s own count on its own test.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>AI tests meant to last for years are being maxed out within one to two years</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/benchmark-saturation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/benchmark-saturation/</guid><description>On tests launched in 2025–26, the best AI scores went from near 0% to over 50% within months, so test makers keep building harder ones.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI rebuilt a 16,000-line program from scratch, a job estimated at 2–17 weeks for a person</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/mirrorcode-weeks-long-coding-tasks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/mirrorcode-weeks-long-coding-tasks/</guid><description>Given only a working program and its tests, Claude Opus 4.6 recreated it almost perfectly. Months-long coding jobs are still too hard.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>computer-science</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI rose from 31% to 83.5% on fixing real code bugs, then OpenAI dropped the test as flawed</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/swe-bench-verified-saturation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/swe-bench-verified-saturation/</guid><description>Built from real bug reports, SWE-bench Verified was a standard coding test. OpenAI dropped it in 2026 over broken tests and memorised fixes.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>computer-science</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>The length of tasks AI agents can finish alone has doubled about every 4 months since 2023</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-time-horizon-doubling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-time-horizon-doubling/</guid><description>In 2023 the best AI could do, half the time, software tasks taking a skilled person about 4 minutes. By February 2026 it was about 12 hours.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>computer-science</category></item><item><title>OpenAI&apos;s AI solved all 12 problems at the top university coding contest; the best team solved 11</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/icpc-world-finals-2025/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/icpc-world-finals-2025/</guid><description>At the 2025 ICPC World Finals, Google&apos;s Gemini also solved 10 of 12, including one that none of the 139 university teams solved.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>computer-science</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI from Google and OpenAI hit gold-medal level at the 2025 Maths Olympiad: 35 of 42 points</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/imo-2025-gold-level/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/imo-2025-gold-level/</guid><description>Two AI systems solved 5 of 6 problems with plain-language proofs, in the time limits. The contest graded Google&apos;s; OpenAI chose its graders.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>o3 beat 34 of 36 virologists on a written lab test, but AI gave novices no clear lab boost</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/virology-capabilities-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/virology-capabilities-test/</guid><description>On written lab-problem questions, o3 scored 43.8% to virologists&apos; 22.1%. In a 2026 trial, AI did not significantly help novices in the lab.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>GPT-4&apos;s level of ability got about 300× cheaper in under two years, then stopped falling</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/price-of-gpt4-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/price-of-gpt4-level-performance/</guid><description>The cheapest model matching GPT-4 on PhD-level science fell from $37.50 to $0.12 per million tokens by late 2024. Top models stay pricey.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cost-of-intelligence</category><category>benchmarks</category></item></channel></rss>