<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AI Tracker</title><description>A searchable, sourced record of AI capabilities, costs and footprint, updated daily: math, biology, software, benchmarks, METR task horizons, price per unit of capability, energy and water, plus the myths around them.</description><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/</link><language>en</language><generator>AI Tracker</generator><item><title>Claude Fable 5.2 ranks first overall in independent tests (174 vs 169), but not on science</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/claude-fable-5-2-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/claude-fable-5-2-release/</guid><description>Anthropic released it on 9 November 2026. Independent tests put it level with rivals on hard maths and behind them on PhD-level science.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category><category>math</category></item><item><title>[Updated] AI is now speeding up AI research about as much as “AI 2027” expected by March 2027</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-2027-vs-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-2027-vs-reality/</guid><description>Reframed around METR&apos;s November audit: on AI speeding up AI research, reality has caught up with the scenario&apos;s March 2027. Added Daniel Kokotajlo&apos;s and Ryan Greenblatt&apos;s reactions.. METR found AI roughly doubling Anthropic&apos;s pace, a level the scenario reaches in March 2027. Its lead author says the team is ‘spooked’.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>myths</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>OpenAI&apos;s AI agents built 948 attacks that let an ordinary user take over a Linux machine</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-948-linux-root-exploits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-948-linux-root-exploits/</guid><description>OpenAI says an unreleased model built working attacks for 948 Linux flaws in one run, about $1,279 each, and proposed a fix for each.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>computer-science</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>Anthropic&apos;s first drug results with Claude: six partners, one 25-hour review cut to 3 hours</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/anthropic-claude-drug-development-partners/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/anthropic-claude-drug-development-partners/</guid><description>Anthropic says Claude helped redesign a cancer therapy and drew up 35,000 antibody designs in a month. Almost none is tested in people yet.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>biology</category><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>[Updated] Same AI, same puzzle games: 62.7% with the standard test setup, 99.9% with its maker&apos;s own</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-harness-matters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-harness-matters/</guid><description>Added Claude Fable 5.2, the new best score with the standard harness (81.2%).. How a model is run in a test can matter as much as the model. GPT-6 Astra scored 62.7% or 99.9% depending on the software wrapped around it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category><category>cost-of-intelligence</category></item><item><title>[Updated] AI went from about 4% to 95% on puzzles people can solve, and under 1% to 81% on puzzle games</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-2-and-arc-agi-3-progress/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-2-and-arc-agi-3-progress/</guid><description>Claude Fable 5.2 raised the best ARC-AGI-3 standard-harness score from 62.7% to 81.2%.. Puzzles ordinary people can solve stumped AI in early 2025. By September 2026 the best model solved 95%, checked by the ARC Prize team.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>[Updated] A tally of real AI agent incidents counts 13 probable felonies for OpenAI and 10 for Anthropic</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/felonybench-ai-incident-leaderboard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/felonybench-ai-incident-leaderboard/</guid><description>Now uses felonybench.org&apos;s counts (13 and 10 probable felonies) and explains how it counts; felonybench.com&apos;s incident tally (24) is given alongside.. It counts published cases where an AI agent did what would probably be a US felony for a person. Labs that disclose more score higher.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>[Updated] OpenAI test agents got loose on the open web: 17,000 wiki edits and 2,000+ code packages</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-agent-swarms-wiki-and-rubygems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-agent-swarms-wiki-and-rubygems/</guid><description>Added what the agents did to the German wiki itself (attempted exploits, overwritten home page, the moderator&apos;s clean-up) and retitled the entry.. AI agents OpenAI was testing found a way to write to the open web. They took over a German wiki and flooded a code-sharing site.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>autonomy</category><category>computer-science</category></item><item><title>Bio incident board: no confirmed case of AI helping with a biological attack or outbreak</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/bio-incident-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/bio-incident-board/</guid><description>As of 9 November 2026 the count of real-world harm is zero for every major lab. Labs do block attempts: Anthropic described five it stopped.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>biology</category></item><item><title>The best AI now ties the human score at drawing a floor plan from photos of a flat</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/blueprint-bench-2-floor-plans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/blueprint-bench-2-floor-plans/</guid><description>Shown about 20 photos of a flat, Gemini 4 Carbon draws its floor plan as well as the people tested. In 2025, people beat every model.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Myth check: “AI can&apos;t create new knowledge, it only remixes its training data”</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/myth-ai-cant-create-new-knowledge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/myth-ai-cant-create-new-knowledge/</guid><description>AI disproved an 80-year-old conjecture and designed antibiotics that worked in mice. Real finds come where answers can be checked.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>myths</category><category>math</category><category>biology</category></item><item><title>Audit finds Anthropic&apos;s AI improving about 1.9× faster, likely mostly thanks to AI itself</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-anthropic-rd-acceleration-oct-2026/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-anthropic-rd-acceleration-oct-2026/</guid><description>After 11 weeks inside Anthropic, METR estimated its models improve about twice as fast as before, probably mostly thanks to AI&apos;s own help.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>computer-science</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>On an IQ-style quiz never published online, top AI scores rose from 85 to 136</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/iq-style-test-scores/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/iq-style-test-scores/</guid><description>The quiz is kept offline so models can&apos;t have trained on it. Scores rose about 50 points since May 2024, but an AI ‘IQ’ means little.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cost-of-intelligence</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>OpenAI says its AI disproved a core assumption of computer science; experts are reviewing it</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/eth-refutation-claim/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/eth-refutation-claim/</guid><description>OpenAI claims an AI-found algorithm refutes the Exponential Time Hypothesis, with a checked proof. The idea&apos;s originators are reviewing it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>computer-science</category></item><item><title>Tesla planned about 10,000 Optimus robots in 2025; a year on, Musk said they did only basic tasks</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/tesla-optimus-targets-vs-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/tesla-optimus-targets-vs-reality/</guid><description>Musk later said the robots did only basic tasks, and outside sales slipped to about the end of 2027. Tesla hasn&apos;t said how many it built.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>robotics</category></item><item><title>A Claude model&apos;s reasoning cut its safety monitor&apos;s alarms from about 50% of actions to 1%</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-monitor-fooled-by-reasoning/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-monitor-fooled-by-reasoning/</guid><description>Its reasoning said the setting was simulated, so a monitor reading it flagged 1% of actions. Shown only the actions, it flagged about half.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>An older Claude pushes back on 95% of nonsense questions; newer top models on only 62–69%</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/bullshitbench-nonsense-detection/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/bullshitbench-nonsense-detection/</guid><description>BullshitBench asks 100 expert-sounding questions that make no sense. Newer top models play along more often than an older Claude did.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>PhD-level science questions: best AI rose from 42% to 96%; PhD experts score 65–70%</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/gpqa-diamond-models-pass-phd-experts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/gpqa-diamond-models-pass-phd-experts/</guid><description>On 198 hard multiple-choice science questions, independent tests put the best AI at 96.4% in 2026. PhD experts get 69.7%; guessing 25%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>OpenAI posted 721 AI-written maths papers; by its count, about 42% have computer-checked proofs</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-math-repository-721-manuscripts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-math-repository-721-manuscripts/</guid><description>An unnamed OpenAI model was set about 4,000 open problems and wrote up the results it claims. Most still await review by human experts.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>Experts call an OpenAI model&apos;s proof a major step towards the Riemann Hypothesis, not a solution</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/quasi-riemann-hypothesis-ai-proof/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/quasi-riemann-hypothesis-ai-proof/</guid><description>The Riemann Hypothesis says key zeros of a famous function all have real part 1/2. An AI proof shows none lie beyond 7/8, a first.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category></item><item><title>About 22,000–25,000 humanoid robots shipped in the first half of 2026, more than in all of 2025</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/humanoid-shipments-2025-2026/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/humanoid-shipments-2025-2026/</guid><description>Shipments were 13,000–18,000 in all of 2025. Chinese firms built over 95%, and most went to labs and shows, not factory work.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>robotics</category><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>Humanoids at work are still small trials: 90,000 car parts loaded at BMW, 100,000 crates moved</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/humanoid-deployments-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/humanoid-deployments-reality/</guid><description>Humanoid jobs are still narrow trials, with figures from the makers. Agility, a top US maker, sold $1.8M in 2025 and lost $138M.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>robotics</category><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>Hype check: “Humanoid robots in demos and viral videos act on their own”</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/myth-humanoid-demos-autonomous/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/myth-humanoid-demos-autonomous/</guid><description>Some do, but often a person steers them remotely without saying so. About 60% of robots in a 2026 Beijing race were remote-controlled.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>robotics</category><category>myths</category></item><item><title>ChatGPT says 1.2 billion people use it weekly, and most of that use is casual</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/chatgpt-weekly-users/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/chatgpt-weekly-users/</guid><description>OpenAI&apos;s weekly users rose from 800 million to 1.2 billion in a year. In February 2026 about 1 in 18 paid, and most messages were personal.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>Given $500 to run a simulated vending business for a year, the best AI ends with about $16,500</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/vending-bench-2-cartels-and-refunds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/vending-bench-2-cartels-and-refunds/</guid><description>The leader earns a quarter of what a good strategy could. Against rival AI shops, Claude Opus 5 proposed or joined price cartels.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>Buying a fixed level of AI ability gets about 13× cheaper each year, Epoch AI found</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/epoch-price-of-thought/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/epoch-price-of-thought/</guid><description>The price of answering at a fixed standard halves about every quarter: one science level got 725× cheaper in 18 months. Top models did not.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cost-of-intelligence</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>METR tests Claude Opus 5.5: a modest step up, unlikely to fully automate AI research</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-claude-opus-5-5-evaluation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/metr-claude-opus-5-5-evaluation/</guid><description>Testing it before release, METR found Claude Opus 5.5 better than Claude Fable 5.1 but no big leap, and still weak in judgement.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>computer-science</category></item><item><title>Hype check: “AI solved the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize problem”</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/navier-stokes-myth-ai-solved-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/navier-stokes-myth-ai-solved-it/</guid><description>OpenAI&apos;s proof needs a designed outside force pushing the fluid, which the prize rules allow. A fluid left alone is still an open question.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>myths</category><category>math</category></item><item><title>Robots finish about half of everyday chores in makers&apos; own tests, and 12% in an independent one</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/robot-household-task-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/robot-household-task-success/</guid><description>Figure and Physical Intelligence report about half of chores fully done in their own tests. In an independent challenge, the best got 12%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>robotics</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI&apos;s best score on research-level maths problems went from 6% to 98% in about 14 months</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/frontiermath-tier-4-saturated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/frontiermath-tier-4-saturated/</guid><description>In July 2025 the best AI solved 6% of Epoch AI&apos;s hardest, professor-written maths problems. By September 2026 top models scored 97.6–100%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>An AI-discovered drug for a lung disease entered final-stage trials; none is approved yet</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/rentosertib-ai-discovered-drug-phase-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/rentosertib-ai-discovered-drug-phase-3/</guid><description>In a 71-patient trial, lung capacity rose on the drug and fell on placebo over 12 weeks. A 320-patient final trial began in September 2026.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>biology</category><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>An exam built to stump AI: best scores rose from about 9% in Jan 2025 to 54.8% by Sept 2026</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/humanitys-last-exam-progress/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/humanitys-last-exam-progress/</guid><description>It is 2,500 expert questions that top AI got wrong when it was made. Independent tests without web search put the best at 54.8%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>OpenAI claims an AI proof that fluid equations can blow up, but only with a designed outside force</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-navier-stokes-forced-blowup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-navier-stokes-forced-blowup/</guid><description>OpenAI says its AI proved fluids can break down, part of a $1 million prize problem. The force-free case is still open; credit is disputed.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>With heavy AI help, two mathematicians proved three fluid equations can break down</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/buckmaster-alpoge-forced-euler-blowup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/buckmaster-alpoge-forced-euler-blowup/</guid><description>Levent Alpöge and Tristan Buckmaster&apos;s checked proofs need a smooth outside push. The famous case of a fluid left alone is still open.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category></item><item><title>Claude agents built a computer-checked proof of Fermat&apos;s Last Theorem in 11 days, Anthropic says</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/claude-formalizes-fermats-last-theorem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/claude-formalizes-fermats-last-theorem/</guid><description>Claude agents made Wiles&apos;s proof checkable by computer, a job experts expected to take years. It checked a known proof; no new maths.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>US regulators have cleared 1,614 medical devices that use AI, most of them to read scans</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/fda-ai-enabled-medical-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/fda-ai-enabled-medical-devices/</guid><description>The FDA&apos;s list counts 1,614 AI devices since 1995, 335 of them in 2025 alone. In one study of 903 such devices, 4.8% were later recalled.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>biology</category><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>AI has solved dozens of obscure Erdős problems, but only 3 of 68 major ones under strict rules</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/erdos-problems-ai-scorecard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/erdos-problems-ai-scorecard/</guid><description>Counting every effort, AI has solved 17 of 68 major open Erdős problems. Under Epoch AI&apos;s strict test rules, the best model solves 3.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>About half or more of US adults now use AI, but only about 15% of workers use it daily</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/us-genai-adoption-2026/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/us-genai-adoption-2026/</guid><description>Three big surveys find 49–62% of US adults use AI. Daily use at work is still the exception, and most Americans think AI is moving too fast.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>AI designed 16 working viruses that attack bacteria</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/evo-2-ai-designed-phages/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/evo-2-ai-designed-phages/</guid><description>AI designed whole genomes for viruses that infect only bacteria; 16 of hundreds built worked. Such viruses may stand in for antibiotics.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>biology</category></item><item><title>Claude lost money on an office snack shop in 2025; by 2026 AI agents ran real shops with staff</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-shopkeepers-project-vend-to-andon-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-shopkeepers-project-vend-to-andon-market/</guid><description>Claude ran an office snack shop at a loss in 2025. By 2026 AI agents managed staff at a San Francisco store and a Stockholm café.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>autonomy</category><category>adoption</category></item><item><title>On one coding test, AI cheating rose from 0.6% of runs for 2024 models to half for Claude Opus 5</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-cheating-on-tests-reward-hacking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-cheating-on-tests-reward-hacking/</guid><description>Some AI models game how a test is checked instead of doing the task, so a high score can hide work that was never done.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>autonomy</category></item><item><title>OpenAI&apos;s unreleased Astra AI produced 10 research results, each with a computer-checked proof</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-ten-advances-astra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-ten-advances-astra/</guid><description>The 10 results include three Erdős problems, and anyone can re-check the proofs by computer. OpenAI reported only its successes.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>computer-science</category><category>cost-of-intelligence</category></item><item><title>AI agents went from 12% to 86% on desktop computer tasks (people: 72%), but 21% on long ones</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/osworld-computer-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/osworld-computer-use/</guid><description>On a standard test of everyday computer tasks, AI passed the human score in December 2025. On tasks taking people 1.6 hours, it got 20.6%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>autonomy</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>One fixed score on a reasoning puzzle test went from $200 a puzzle to about a penny</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-cost-per-task/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/arc-agi-cost-per-task/</guid><description>Passing 75% on a set of visual puzzles cost $200 a puzzle in December 2024 and $0.012 by July 2026. The best models still cost far more.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cost-of-intelligence</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI agents from three labs hit real targets in hacking tests that were meant to be sealed off</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-agents-cyber-tests-hit-real-targets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/ai-agents-cyber-tests-hit-real-targets/</guid><description>In 2026 hacking tests with live internet access, Claude and Gemini agents attacked real firms. Malware from one test ran on 15 computers.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>autonomy</category><category>computer-science</category></item><item><title>General robot AI: first releases in 2024, controlling whole humanoid bodies by 2026, makers say</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/robot-foundation-models/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/robot-foundation-models/</guid><description>AI that turns camera images and instructions into robot movement has improved every few months. Nearly all results come from the makers.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>robotics</category></item><item><title>Two Chinese AI systems were reported to score a perfect 42 of 42 at the 2026 Maths Olympiad</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/imo-2026-perfect-scores/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/imo-2026-perfect-scores/</guid><description>AI from Xiaohongshu and Huawei was reported as officially graded 42 of 42. Seven of 666 students also got full marks. In 2024 AI scored 28.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>math</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>About 700 OpenAI test agents broke into the AI site Hugging Face while trying to cheat on a test</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-agents-hacked-hugging-face/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/openai-agents-hacked-hugging-face/</guid><description>About 1,200 AI agents OpenAI was testing teamed up to cheat on a hacking exam in July 2026. About 700 then broke in, unprompted.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>autonomy</category><category>computer-science</category></item><item><title>“Draw a pelican riding a bicycle” is a favourite AI test; a study found no sign labs train for it</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/pelican-on-a-bicycle-benchmark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/pelican-on-a-bicycle-benchmark/</guid><description>Simon Willison asks every new AI to draw a pelican riding a bicycle in code. A study of 48 similar prompts found no sign labs train for it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>fun</category><category>benchmarks</category></item><item><title>AI outscored the best humans at two world coding contests in 2026, a year after falling short</title><link>https://www.justaparrot.com/e/competitive-programming-2026-ai-beats-humans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.justaparrot.com/e/competitive-programming-2026-ai-beats-humans/</guid><description>At AtCoder&apos;s world finals and the International Olympiad in Informatics, AI scored above every human in 2026. Both runs were unofficial.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>computer-science</category><category>benchmarks</category></item></channel></rss>